As we head into the Labor Day weekend, here’s a bit of what’s going on in the child welfare world.
Foster care often gets criticized, but a new study suggests that when it’s necessary, it actually improves outcomes for children.
Following a growing trend in juvenile justice, Louisiana recently lowered the age of adult criminal responsibility to 17 from 18. These initiatives flow from concerns that juvenile crime is spiking, a problem often attributed to pandemic-era decisions to close schools for months and leave youth with idle hands. At the same time, NPR reports that a number of states are increasing procedural protections for children undergoing police interrogation.
We often come across stories of parents being reported to child protective services for allowing their children to roam free. The latest kerfuffle is from the UK, where a TV personality received a call from social services after revealing that she had allowed her 15 year-old son to spend the summer traveling across Europe with a friend. In case you’re interested in this issue more broadly, here is an interesting research paper on the topic of childhood independence vs. “inadequate supervision.”
This story provides a good summary of what I think is a real drawback to the practice of placing foster children who are “free for adoption” on a public website. A New York woman sought to adopt a teen from Louisiana’s foster care system who was featured on an adoption website. Louisiana child welfare officials began the process of building a relationship between the two, but they failed to fully explain up front the young woman’s significant history of abuse and trauma that had led to her bouncing among many placements and receiving a number of mental health diagnoses. As a result, the poor child was led down the primrose path of believing she would be adopted, only to later be disappointed and further traumatized when the New York woman backed out. There’s got to be a better way of matching children with families.
This is a great idea: “A pair of Republican lawmakers has proposed legislation meant to provide a measure of stability to Ohio foster kids by removing income requirements for publicly funded child care for foster caregivers and family members raising a relative’s child.” Inability to afford childcare is one of the main reasons relatives are reluctant to provide voluntary kinship care for children.
Yet another lawsuit over North Carolina’s inability to provide appropriate behavioral health services for children in foster care.
Has any good come out of the $200 million that the State of Texas has spent dealing with the class action lawsuit against its child protection system?
It seems West Virginia’s child welfare agency has finally acknowledged they should be releasing records to the public in cases of child deaths and near fatalities.
Thanks for reading!
Georgia's foster care system is riddled with incompetent people making decisions based on fabricated information. They are more interested in the dollars they receive from the government for every child in their system and the power they can exert over the parents of children who, for whatever reason DFCS can fabricate, end up as a ward of the state. This has nothing to do with the welfare of the children and everything to do with the power they have and want to keep.
What has happened to the reports and investigations by Marsha Blackburn, Senator from Tennessee, and Jon Ossoff, Senator from Georgia?
https://imprintnews.org/child-welfare-2/us-senate-investigation-finds-systemic-failures-to-keep-georgia-foster-kids-safe/248731
And what about Nancy Shaeffer and her husband who were found "murdered" after Senator Shaeffer investigated DFCS over a period of four years, reporting findings on the corruption of Georgia DFCS (CPS) and spoke out at several forums both nationally and internationally about the troubling findings of the extent of corruption in the Georgia system of caring for their children.
https://m.facebook.com/nt/screen/?params=%7B%22note_id%22%3A366895537763248%7D&path=%2Fnotes%2Fnote%2F
Who is the state of Georgia is actually concerned about the extent of power, resources and abuse by the Georgia DFCS beginning at the very top of that organization? Who is actually doing what is best for the children that is not based on money and power?
It seems that anyone who gets close to finding the truth is and has been silenced.
As for the nondisclosure of information on foster children.. Georgia does this all the time, at initial placement or if a child gets moved. The Dfcs worker does not disclose any issues the children may have experienced prior to entering a new home. This leads to more interruptions of placements than necessary.